Home Health Care Focus

The Hidden Cost of Free Software

2010-03-17T17:14:00.000-07:00

Sure, times are hard. Recent changes to Medicare regulations and a unco-operative economy are causing many agencies and related home health businesses to seriously consider their futures. And there is a big trap, out there, ready to snare unsuspecting agency owners and make their jobs even harder for them.

That trap is Free Software.

It must be understood that there are vendors of home health care software that are credible, reliable, and reputable. But, healthcare is seen as a potential source of profitable business and there are many players that have arrived on the scene, looking for short-term profits, whatever the cost. These players will develop a product that offers agencies the bare essentials to run a home health care business. When a customer starts billing, then the software vendor will start to charge for their product. This is OK for start-ups and early-stage agencies. But what happens is that an agency will lock itself in to a poorly designed system, potentially for a multi-year contract. They will enter data, train their staff, and incorporate the product in to their agency workflow. And when that agency is starting to really rock-and-roll with plenty of patient referrals, they find that their software choice is incapable of supporting their business volume. At that point, it is a hard, and potentially costly decision to change to a different product and so the agency struggles on, with their software choice holding up their business growth.

What is worse is when software companies that essentially give their product away in order to secure longer term revenue, fail to be able to fund on-going research and development. The product stagnates. New features and functions quickly become basic expectations. And that software company's lack of cash to invest in their systems means that their customers suffer - slow and incomplete development, skimpy customer support, mediocre training resources, and, potentially, a company that is forced to go out of business.

Where does that leave its customers? High and dry with all their patient information stored on the remote servers of a bankrupt software vendor.

So, don't thing that free software is always good software. Vendors have a business to run, costs to cover, and investments to make in the on-going development of a product for you, the customer, as well as a trained and talented team of customer support staff and trainers, also for you, the customer.

If you are offered a deal that is too good to be true, it probably is. You are running your business - you know what it takes. Software vendors have to do the same thing. No income means a poorly run business that will probably fail. If you are paying your software vendor for their product, you are helping to guarantee your future success.

Will Your Agency Sink or Swim?

2010-03-09T13:40:00.000-08:00

Back in the 1970's, Sir Richard Branson, the founder and chairman of Virgin Atlantic, had opened up his first record stores in London, with the profits he had made from selling used records in the back of his university newsletter. He was ambitious, and a few record stores in and around London was not his idea of success. But sales were not where they needed to be. He could do one of two things - liquidate everything, and declare bankruptcy, or get a loan and overcome his financial obstacles to growth.

With a new injection of approximately $45,000, he bought his first recording studio, put out records of the Sex Pistols and Boy George, and then bought his first Boeing 747 to start Virgin Atlantic Airlines. Branson is now listed as one of the richest people in the world and has interests in more than 360 companies.

What does this mean to you?

With so many changes to regulations and funding, it can be a tough time for home health care agencies. It is not uncommon to be completely distracted by the need to cut costs in order to stay in business. But those agencies that WILL be successful are those that take a broader view. They understand that they need to "manage" costs more than cutting them. This is most effectively achieved when a business can do more with less, and can re-assign skilled resources to tasks that are more directly profitable.

One of the easiest ways for an agency to manage their costs more effectively is to review the tools that they use to run their business. Almost every agency has some form of software. Some applications have been developed to run entire hospitals, doctor's offices, and everything in between. These are big, expensive, and overkill for most agencies. Other applications have been developed to do just the essential tasks that an agency would need to perform - 485, OASIS, scheduling, billing. Many of these have been created and are sold by very small companies with questionable longevity.

There has never been a better time to look at Igea HHC from Indura Systems. A full-service, fully featured home health care solution, Igea HHC is used by hundreds of agencies throughout the United States. Happy customers tell us of their ability to manage more patients with less staff, and, at the same time, make their billing more accurate and cost-effective.

Igea HHC is a professional-grade product with a reputation for high performance, ease of use, and on-going compliance. Indura Systems is dedicated to home health care, at the industry level, and in partnership with every one of our agency customers.

With regular system updates that deliver critical features that touch on all parts of an agency's workflow, Igea HHC customers can be sure of always getting the home health care system they need, to run their business smoothly, efficiently, and profitably.

For a limited time, we are offering some very special payment options to make it as easy as possible for agencies to benefit from Igea HHC. There really is no better time than right now.

Contact Indura Systems today for your no obligation demonstration, and discover why Igea HHC customers are looking forward to 2010!

Valuable Source of Free Training

2010-02-10T11:22:00.000-08:00

We are always looking for ways to reduce costs while improving effectiveness, and getting something that is truly valuable, for free, is becoming increasingly rare.

So for those of you who need to recap or train employees on claim/billing-related topics, CAHABA offers a valuable source of free training available for anybody:

https://www.cahabagba.com/rhhi/education/online_courses/index.htm

Indura Systems PPS Outlier Education

2009-12-07T17:57:00.000-08:00

In order to give our customers the information and planning they need to be able to Plan to Profit in 2010, Indura Systems is running a series of PPS Outlier Education workshops in our Miami office during December only.

Already, most of these workshops are fully booked but we may add more dates depending on demand.

The workshops will take the audience, step by step, through the changes to outlier rules and regulations, which will come in to force in January 2010. We will also give all attendees a simple 10 step action plan to help them minimize the impact of these new regulations on their day-to-day business.

To learn more about these workshops, contact our Customer Support line at (305) 675-6704.

CMS ANNOUNCES POLICY AND PAYMENT UPDATES

2009-11-12T17:32:00.000-08:00

News that is generating a lot of questions was posted by CMS on October 30, 2009. Indura Systems customers can be sure that our top-rated customer support team is ready and available to answer your questions on this topic.

A link to the rule can be found below:
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HomeHealthPPS/HHPPSRN/itemdetail.asp?filterType=none&filterByDID=0&sortByDID=3&sortOrder=ascending&itemID=CMS1230142&intNumPerPage=10

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) today announces a 2.0 percent market basket update to Medicare’s calendar year (CY) 2010 home health prospective payment system (HH PPS) rates and modifications to the home health outlier policy. These improvements are evidence of CMS’ continued efforts to ensure appropriate payments, to prevent fraud and abuse, and to protect beneficiaries in the Medicare home health program. Home health agencies (HHAs) receive additional payments (outlier payments) for 60-day home health episodes of care that carry unusually high costs. For CY 2010, CMS will cap home health outlier payments at 10 percent per HHA and target total aggregate outlier payments at 2.5 percent of all HH PPS payments. The current (2009) target for aggregate outlier payments is 5 percent of total HH PPS expenditures. By lowering the total outlier payment target to 2.5 percent, this final rule increases home health base rates by 2.5 percent for CY 2010.

“This final regulation builds on Medicare’s efforts to refine its payment systems while working to reduce waste, fraud and abuse,” said Jonathan Blum, director of CMS’s Center for Medicare Management. “Through the use of up-to-date home health data, it also provides a clearer focus for oversight of the program while encouraging better coordination of Medicare’s home health benefits.”

In this final rule, CMS continues its current policy of a 2.75 percent reduction to national standardized 60-day episode payment rates and non-medical supply factors in CY 2010. Retention of this policy will help offset the increase in the home health case-mix that is not associated with any underlying change in the actual clinical conditions of home health patients. This CY 2010 reduction is the third year of a four-year phase-in of HH PPS rate adjustments, which were made final in the HH PPS Refinement and Rate Update for the CY 2008 final rule.

Historically, home health payment rates have been updated annually by either the full home health market basket index or by an adjustment to the home health market basket index by Congress. CMS uses the home health market basket index – an inflation measurement of the costs of the mix of goods and services offered by home health agencies. The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) provided for an adjustment to the home health market basket percentage update for CY 2007 and subsequent years depending on quality data submissions by HHAs.

Through implementation of new payment and enrollment safeguards, this final rule will reduce Medicare’s vulnerability to fraud, abuse and improper payments. HHAs currently submit Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data as a condition of participation in Medicare. Beginning Jan. 1, 2010, the final rule will require HHAs to submit OASIS data as a condition of payment under HH PPS.

CMS is implementing an improved version of OASIS, called OASIS-C, to collect data on all episodes of care beginning Jan. 1, 2010. This data will document important aspects of the patient’s health status including clinical condition, functional abilities, and service needs. As a result, a clinician will be able to capture a clear and accurate picture of the patient which will assist in development of an appropriate plan of care. Documentation provided through OASIS-C also could be used to signal concerns about patient health, encourage preventive care, identify needs for additional patient treatment, and record patient immunizations and vaccinations.

In CY 2010, CMS will publicly report 12 nationally accepted and approved quality measures plus 13 new process measures on its CMS Home Health Compare Web site (http://www.Medicare.gov/HHCompare) HHAs that submit required quality data will receive payments based on the full home health market basket update of 2.0 percent for CY 2010. The home health market basket index percentage will be reduced by 2 percentage points to 0.0 percent for CY 2010 for those HHAs that do not submit the required quality data. For CY 2012, CMS will require HHAs to report, as part of the required home health quality measures, the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Home Health Care Survey for Medicare and/or Medicaid beneficiaries.

To qualify for the Medicare home health benefit, a Medicare beneficiary must be under the care of a physician and: have an intermittent need for skilled nursing care; need physical or speech therapy; or, have a continuing need for occupational therapy. The beneficiary also must be homebound and receive home health services from a Medicare approved HHA.

28th Annual Home Care and Hospice Conference and Exposition

2009-10-15T16:05:00.000-07:00

We were delighted to attend the 28th Annual Home Care and Hospice Conference and Exposition in Los Angeles this year. Our new booth was on display and we enjoyed talking with many visitors about our point of care system, iPOC, and introducing our new EMR product, Igea EMR, due for release in Q1 2010.

Many existing Igea customers visited us to share their delight with Igea HHC, and to offer us valuable feedback on features and functions they would like to see in future releases. All this information is carefully documented and passed to our research and development team.

A number of visitors asked us about OASIS-C and ICD10 and we were happy to reassure them that our entire product line will remain compliant through all future changes to these standards.

Janet Rosta from the Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation in Tennessee was the lucky winner of our Dell Mini 10 Netbook, a special prize awarded to all those who visited our booth and could answer 5 questions about Indura Systems and Igea HHC. Congratulations to Janet.

A new newsletter will be distributed soon and will include some exciting updates and screen shots of our trade show attendance, and our Igea EMR beta release.

Medicare reimbursement for H1N1 vaccine vs. seasonal influenza

2009-09-01T15:26:00.001-07:00

The Influenza vaccine for 2009 is reimbursed on reasonable cost, while the Influenza administration rate is reimbursed on the wage adjusted outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) reimbursement rate.

The OPPS reimbursement rate for 2009 is $24.89. The rate is wage adjusted where the labor portion is 60% and non-labor portion is 40%.

The H1N1 vaccine is to be provided at no charge to providers therefore, there will be no provider reimbursement for the H1N1 vaccine. Medicare will reimburse providers for the administration of the H1N1 vaccine at the same rate as the influenza vaccine administration rate. Home health providers will be reimbursed at the wage adjusted amount for $24.89.

For example, in 2009, the national unadjusted payment rate is $24.89. If the wage index for the applicable CBSA is .99, then the payment to the HHA would be $24.74

$24.89*.6=$14.934 (the portion to be wage adjusted);

$14.934*.99 (the wage index) =$14.78466 (the wage adjusted portion of the payment)

$14.78466+$9.956 (the 40% of the national unadjusted payment that is not wage adjusted) = $24.74 (after rounding)).

Home Healthcare Focus - August 2009

2009-08-17T12:03:00.000-07:00

We are pleased to announce the publication of our August 2009 newsletter, Home Healthcare Focus.

This issue covers:

Reacting to the Health Care Debate
How Home Health Care Saves Billions of Dollars
CMS Boosting Home Health Payments
Increase in Drug Plan Premiums for Medicare
Avoiding Falling in to the Trap of False Economy
Health Insurance Reform Affecting Services

As well as our latest product news, tips on using Igea HHC, and our latest company news.

Read the newsletter here.

CMS issues proposed home health payment rule

2009-07-31T14:41:00.000-07:00

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on July 30 proposed a net decrease of -0.86% in Medicare payments for home health agencies in calendar year 2010. This includes a 2.2% market basket update, which would be decreased by 2.75% as part of a four-year series of cuts that adjust for coding changes between 1999 and 2005. In addition, the rule states that CMS is considering additional coding reductions, based on further analysis of case mix change, that could lower 2010 payments by -4.90.

The proposed rule would also cap outlier payments at 10% per agency and limit total outlier payments to 2.5% of total HH PPS payments. The rule will be published in the Aug. 6 Federal Register with comments accepted through Sept. 28.

Home health agencies (HHAs) receive additional payments (outlier payments) for 60-day home health episodes of care that carry unusually high costs. CMS proposes to cap outlier payments at 10 percent per agency and target total aggregate outlier payments at 2.5 percent of total HH PPS payments. Currently, the target for outlier payment targets is 5 percent of total HH PPS payments. As such, CMS reduces home health rates by 5 percent to fund outlier payments. By lowering the total outlier payment target to 2.5 percent of total HH PPS payments, CMS would increase home health rates by 2.5 percent.

Read the full article.

Presidential Report Confirms Health Care Jobs On The Rise

2009-07-14T12:33:00.000-07:00

We didn’t have to read the new jobs report from Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers to know that health care’s going to add a lot of jobs over the next several years.

But we were interested in the report’s finding that the biggest job growth of any category in the economy would come not for doctors, nurses, or nursing home workers, but for a broadly defined group called “other medical services and dentists.”

The report defines that group as “a broad category including the ever-expanding home health care, outpatient care, and medical and diagnostic laboratories subsectors,” and projects more than 2 million new jobs per year for the group, on average, between 2008 and 2016.

A separate projection looks at the growth of health-related jobs versus all other occupations between 2000 and 2016. The finding: 12% growth for “other occupations”; 35% growth for “health practitioners”; and 48% growth for “health care support.” Health care support includes physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, medical social workers and home health care aides, the report says.

Joint Commission Offers Seasonal Flu Immunization Strategies

2009-06-24T15:50:00.000-07:00

Free Monograph Designed to Improve Health Care Worker Vaccination Rates

(OAKBROOK TERRACE, Ill. – June 24, 2009) Seasonal influenza in health care workers is a personal health threat, but also poses a significant risk to the patients in their care. In an effort to help health care organizations improve the rate of health care worker influenza vaccinations, The Joint Commission is releasing a monograph “Providing a Safer Environment for Health Care Personnel and Patients Through Influenza Vaccination: Strategies from Research and Practice.”

The monograph, which was supported by an educational grant from sanofi pasteur, is the result of the project Strategies for Implementing Successful Influenza Immunization Programs for Health Care Personnel, a 10-month collaboration between The Joint Commission, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. (APIC), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), and the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID).

The monograph includes information about seasonal influenza and the influenza vaccine, barriers to successful programs and strategies for overcoming them, and examples of successful initiatives organizations have used to improve their influenza vaccination rates. The Joint Commission received more than 229 submissions from health care organizations and a subset of submissions was selected for a panel review. Ultimately, 28 submissions were selected for inclusion in the monograph.

The monograph incorporates evidence-based guidelines and published literature to highlight practical strategies and the tools submitted by health care organizations. Electronic copies of the monograph are available on The Joint Commission’s Web site at www.jointcommission.org, and can be downloaded free of charge.

“Health care worker flu vaccination rates have been less than optimal for years and the vaccination rate is still below 50 percent. Organizations are eager to find ways to encourage their employees to get vaccinated,” says Jerod M. Loeb, Ph.D., executive vice president, Division of Quality Measurement and Research, The Joint Commission. “The monograph includes strategies that organizations can employ and provides a foundation to improve vaccination rates.”

According to the CDC, vaccination coverage of health care personnel remains low despite the documented benefits on patient outcomes, staff absenteeism and reducing infections among staff. In addition, increased vaccination rates can reduce costs within health care organizations. Health care personnel can acquire seasonal influenza from patients and can also spread the disease to vulnerable patients or other staff. In 2007, The Joint Commission implemented a new standard in hospitals and long term care facilities requiring that influenza vaccinations be offered to staff and practitioners.

###

Founded in 1951, The Joint Commission seeks to continuously improve the safety and quality of care provided to the public through the provision of health care accreditation and related services that support performance improvement in health care organizations. The Joint Commission evaluates and accredits more than 16,000 health care organizations and programs in the United States, including more than 8,000 hospitals and home care organizations, and more than 6,200 other health care organizations that provide long term care, behavioral health care, laboratory and ambulatory care services. In addition, The Joint Commission also provides certification of more than 600 disease-specific care programs, primary stroke centers, and health care staffing services. An independent, not-for-profit organization, The Joint Commission is the nation's oldest and largest standards-setting and accrediting body in health care. Learn more about The Joint Commission at www.jointcommission.org.

HCAF Show - Orlando, FL June 24 and 25 2009

2009-06-18T09:43:00.000-07:00

Stop by and meet us at booth 25 in Orlando. We want to give you something!

Bring along one or two of the forms that you use in your home health care agency, in Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel formats, on a CD or USB stick, and we will convert them to digitized forms while you wait - no charge!

While we convert your forms, we will show you home health care agencies are increasingly turning to point of care solutions to make it easier for caregivers to capture and deliver notes for their entire treatment schedule. This helps agencies submit their bills faster - no more searching for visit notes, no more transcribing of notes in to other systems.

Come and meet our team at booth 25, HCAF Show, Omni Orlando Resort at Championsgate, Orlando, Florida, 5:00pm to 7:30pm on June 24th, and 7:00am to 6:30pm on June 25th, 2009.

To call ahead to schedule an appointment, phone (305) 675-6704 and ask for Marc on extension 704.

ENSURE APPROPRIATE PAY FOR HEALTH SERVICES

2009-03-13T10:32:00.000-07:00

ENSURE ADEQUATE AND APPROPRIATE PAYMENT
FOR MEDICARE HOME HEALTH SERVICES

ISSUE: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administratively has promulgated a 2.75 percent across-the-board rate reduction for home health services for 2008, 2009, and 2010, as well as a 2.71 percent cut for 2011. The 2.75 percent cuts scheduled for 2008 and 2009 have been implemented. Over the next five years (2009- 2013) these cuts will reduce outlays for home health by $7.59 billion unless Congress blocks them. These reductions are based on an unfounded allegation by CMS that case mix weights have increased without attendant changes in patient characteristics, referred to by CMS as “case mix creep” or “upcoding.”

In its 2009 report to Congress, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission(MedPAC) recommended that Congress eliminate the home health market basket update for 2010 and accelerate the application of the 2011 coding creep adjustment proposed for 2011 (2.71 percent) to 2010—reducing current rates in 2010 by 5.46 percent. MedPAC also recommended that Congress direct CMS to rebase home health payments in 2011, using 2007 costs as a base.

A 5 percent rural payment differential or “rural add-on” for home health services delivered in rural areas expired on December 31, 2006. This has resulted in rural home health agency closures and threatened access to home health care for beneficiaries living in rural areas.

In February 2009, the Obama Administration included MedPAC’s 2009 recommendations for deep cuts to home health as part of its proposed FY 2010 budget. Over five years these harmful cuts would take more than $13 billion from the Medicare home health program. The administration’s budget also calls for the bundling of hospital and post acute care payments beginning in 2013.

RECOMMENDATION: Congress should: 1) Reform the Medicare home health payment model to achieve a more reliable payment distribution that reflects varying resource uses and costs incurred in providing care to individual patients; 2) Reject any proposals to cut the home health market basket inflation update or impose additional rate reductions for home health agencies; 3) Reinstate the 5 percent add-on payment for home health services in rural areas; 4) Block the home health case mix rate reductions and reform the regulatory process for evaluating case mix changes; and 5) Reject proposals to bundle home health payments into hospital or other provider payments.

RATIONALE:
• MedPAC’s proposed freeze in home health payments, coupled with the CMS regulatory payment reductions and rebased payment rates, would reduce home health payments by $550 million in 2010, by 2.5 billion in 2011, and by $13 billion from 2010 through 2014. These cuts would come from a benefit that is about $15.5 billion per year ($2 billion less than in 1997) and under control in terms of expenditure growth.

• Currently, about one third of Medicare home health agencies (HHAs) have negative Medicare profit margins. The National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC)as calculated that by 2011, nearly two-thirds of home health agencies will have negative Medicare profit margins if MedPAC’s proposed freeze, accelerated CMS regulatory cuts,and rebasing of payment rates are implemented.

• MedPAC fails to evaluate the impact on care access that occurs with the current wide ranging financial situation of HHAs. Regardless of average margins, there is a wide range in agency margins and thus a wide range in impact that the proposed across-the board cuts in payments would have. There is no evaluation to date of the completely reformed home health payment model put in place in 2008. In the event that the wide range in margins continues, a more sophisticated payment model connecting payments to resource use should be developed.

• MedPAC’s proposal to reduce home health payments is based on claims that home health agencies are making excessive profit margins on Medicare services. MedPAC’s financial analysis of Medicare HHAs, projecting a 12.2 percent margin for 2009, is unreliable. First, it does not include any consideration of the 1,626 agencies (21 percent)that are part of a hospital or skilled nursing facility. In some states, hospital-based HHAs make up the majority of the providers (ND 85.0 percent; SD 76.5 percent; MT 66.7 percent; OR 63.0 percent). Facility-based HHAs have an average Medicare profit margin of negative 6.19 percent. Second, the MedPAC analysis uses a weighted average,combining all HHAs into a single unit, rather than recognizing the individual existence and local nature of each provider. It sees a single national profit margin for freestanding agencies as representative of over 9,700 very diverse HHAs. When all agencies’ margins are included and given equal weight, the true Medicare margin would be closer to 5 percent. About one third of home health agencies currently have negative margins. Third, MedPAC margin data fails to recognize many agency costs, including the cost of telehealth equipment, increasing costs for labor, emergency and bioterrorism preparedness, and system changes to adapt to the new home health payment changes.

• Home health agencies are already in financial jeopardy as a result of Medicaid cuts and inadequate Medicare Advantage and private pay rates. Ongoing study of home health cost reports by the National Association for Home Care & Hospice indicates that the overall financial strength of Medicare home health agencies is weak. The average allpayor profit margin for freestanding HHAs is reduced to 4 percent when taking into account losses from non Medicare payors.

• Recent cost reports reveal that the average Medicare margin for rural agencies is negative 3.52 percent. The loss of the 5 percent rural add-on payment for home health services in rural areas has resulted in reductions in service areas, agency closures, and reports that some agencies had to turn away high resource use patients who are more expensive for agencies to serve. In many rural areas home health agencies can be the primary caregivers for homebound beneficiaries with limited access to transportation.

• The “case mix creep” adjustment ignores increases in patient acuity, particularly a significant increase in orthopedic and neurologically impaired patients requiring restorative therapy. These changes in patient characteristics are documented in a report from the Lewin Group and directly correlate with changes in case mix weights.

• CMS alleges that the entire change in the average case mix weights between 1999 and 2005 is the result of provider upcoding or factors unrelated to changes in patient characteristics. If this had occurred one would expect to see a big increase in Medicare home health expenditures. In fact, as the chart below indicates, Medicare home health expenditures are far lower than the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) had expected under the new Home Health Prospective Payment System and are $2 billion less than in 1997.

• Bundling home care payments into hospital or other provider payments would severely compromise both the quality and availability of home health care for Medicare beneficiaries. It would cause major disruption to the health care industry, be anticompetitive, increase the federal regulatory burden and erect a new and unnecessary barrier to beneficiaries’ access to quality care. Hospitals have no experience in the management of post acute care and no infrastructure to manage utilization review. Hospitals are the highest cost sector so this is not the place to locate efficiencies in post acute care. If bundled payments are considered, they should go to community-based providers that have a breadth of experience in providing post acute care and avoiding unnecessary hospitalizations.

TAKE ACTION NOW:

http://www.congressweb.com/cweb4/index.cfm?orgcode=nahc

President Obama Makes Health Care Reform a Top Priority

2009-03-03T10:33:00.000-08:00

March 03, 2009 - by Lynn Shapiro, Writer

The Senate is pitched for battle, having heard the details of President Obama's plans for health care reform, laid out in the speech he delivered to Americans last week.

It is a certainty that every vested interest will lobby against it, especially pharmaceutical companies, which stand to lose huge sums of money now that the Obama administration plans to spend $1.1 billion for new reviews of generic drugs. The move is based on several recent studies showing that generics sometimes work as well or better than newer, more expensive medicines. The budget also calls for negotiations with drug makers to lower their prices, as Canada and Western European countries now do.

This initiative is a radical departure from President George W. Bush's Prescription Drug Plan of 2003 for Medicare beneficiaries (Medicare Part D), which refused to require drug makers to negotiate their prices downward.

Unlike Bush, Obama appears unafraid of impinging on the fortunes of industry. Neither is he averse to taxing Americans in the highest income bracket. The President said that most workers are unduly constrained by health care costs and that to ease this burden, he would derive $318 billion by raising the taxes on the top 20 percent of tax filers who earn more than $250,000 a year. These individuals would pay 90 percent of all taxes.

Obama's proposal would also eliminate subsidies now given to the private plans that provide care to more than 10 million of the 44 million Medicare beneficiaries. By forcing these plans, known as Medicare Advantage, into a competitive bidding process, the administration says it can save $175 billion over the next 10 years.

The President is counting on the economy to be thriving by 2011. Then, his plan for hiking taxes on high-income payers would make it possible for him to keep his promise to halve the deficit by 2013.

Deficits of almost $1.8 trillion in 2009 and $1.2 trillion in 2010 are frightening. But while Obama wants to extend tax cuts for the middle class, much of the health care package is intended to save the economy and create jobs. So, the massive amount of red ink Americans face should be temporary, the budget assumes.

Deciding when to go from stimulus spending to deficit reduction is the trickiest part of the equation, but doing it is essential, analysts say.

Other Provisions

Another avenue for health care savings would come from slashing Medicare's home health care programs, said to be excessive. What's more, ending rebates from drug companies for medicines sold to Medicaid patients would save the U.S. healthcare system almost $20 billion.

The budget also includes more than $1 billion to help the FDA fortify its food safety program because of the salmonella outcry; $6 billion for cancer research and a program to send nurses to new mothers' homes to check on babies. Another $76.8 billion would go to the Health and Human Services Department to fund electronic medical records to end costly duplication of diagnostic tests and allow doctors to share patient histories. This provision is not only cost-effective but potentially beneficial to the patient, experts say. Obama promises to preserve patients' privacy, even while doctors share patients' records.

White House budget director Peter Orszag projected in commentary over the weekend that the proposed spending would save $1.8 billion in 2010, $16.2 billion in 2011 and increasing amounts annually to create a $633.8 billion fund to pay for health care reform by 2018. Congress has already provided $25 billion to help laid-off workers pay for COBRA.

What's more, Obama says that spending to get coverage for more of America's 46 million uninsured will save money, if preventive care helps patients avoid expensive and chronic diseases.

Money will be also be saved, Obama said, by finding and eliminating overpayments in Medicare. "The Government Accountability Office has labeled Medicare as 'high-risk' due to billions of dollars lost to overpayments and fraud each year," the budget reads.

Better Care, Not More

In conclusion, the budget says "about $26 billion can be saved over 10 years by using a combination of incentives and penalties to prevent avoidable expensive readmission when patients go back into the hospital within a month after treatment. Reforming the way doctors are paid will also reduce costs, by paying them to provide better care rather than more expensive care, such as imaging scans and surgery that may not be necessary." For example, since Obama took office, Medicare has announced it will stop covering virtual colonoscopies, deciding they're too expensive.

None of this will be easy but one thing is for sure. President Obama has made health care reform a top priority.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

House Call Physicians Ineligible for e-Prescribing Incentives

2009-02-24T16:45:00.000-08:00

AAFP Efforts Fail to Reverse CMS Decision
By Sheri Porter 2/24/2009

The AAFP's efforts, in tandem with those of the American Academy of Home Care Physicians, or AAHCP, to correct an oversight in CMS' recently launched electronic-prescribing incentive program, recently resulted in a denial from the agency.

Rick Kellerman, M.D., of Wichita, Kan., an AAFP past president, is shown here checking on a nursing home patient.

In a Feb. 9 letter to CMS Acting Administrator Charlene Frizzera, AAFP Board Chair Jim King, M.D., of Selmer, Tenn., pointed out that, as currently implemented by CMS, Section 132 of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 "precludes physicians who practice predominantly, if not exclusively, as house call physicians from participation in the e-prescribing incentive program." On Feb. 23, however, AAFP News Now learned from AAHCP Executive Director Constance Row that CMS had declined to make the changes recommended by the two organizations.

Relevant CPT Codes Overlooked

The issue lies with the agency's choice of CPT codes that appear in the denominator of the e-prescribing legislation. As King pointed out in his letter to CMS, those CPT codes include services provided in the areas of psychotherapy, general ophthalmological services, health and behavior assessment and intervention, office and outpatient visits, and office consultations. However, CMS failed to include codes typically used by physicians who focus their practices on house call services, said King.

Those codes also include care provided to patients living in nursing homes. King argued that many house call physicians were early adopters of health information technology and e-prescribing. He said patients served by home care physicians usually have multiple comorbidities that call for an array of prescriptions that would be more efficiently handled electronically.According to Row, however, "CMS has decided definitively not to add these codes to the 2009 electronic-prescribing incentive program." She added that the letter from CMS indicated the agency may "consider changes for 2010 or beyond."

Statistics Reinforce Call for Inclusion

Row said that statistics provided by CMS only reinforce the argument that home health care physicians and other eligible providers should have the opportunity to benefit financially from the e-prescribing bonus program. She cited figures from CMS' Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Record that details Part B claims paid by Medicare carriers in 2007.According to those data, all Medicare providers combined logged 2,194,083 total house calls and 1,696,411 total domiciliary visits (i.e., house calls to patients residing in assisted living facilities) in 2007.

Family physicians alone logged 410,582 house call visits and 286,521 domiciliary visits in 2007. In his letter, King called on CMS to add home services CPT codes 99341 to 99350 and domiciliary/rest home visit CPT codes 99324 to 99337 to the denominator for eligibility in the e-prescribing incentive program.Row said that in light of CMS' rejection of that suggestion, her organization would continue to work closely with the AAFP for possible resolution of the issue in 2010.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report

2009-02-24T15:11:00.000-08:00

Health Care Marketplace Health Care Spending Will Account for One-Fifth of GDP in 2018; Federal Government Will Pay More Than 50% of Those Costs, According to CMS Report [Feb 24, 2009]

Overall U.S. health care spending will reach $2.5 trillion in 2009, a 5.5% increase from 2008, when health care spending increased by 6.1%, according to a CMS report published Tuesday in the journal Health Affairs, the Wall Street Journal reports (Zhang, Wall Street Journal, 2/24).

Total health care spending will account for 17.6% of the gross domestic product in 2009, a full percentage point higher than 2008, marking the largest one-year increase since CMS began tracking health care spending in 1960 (Dunham, Reuters/Boston Globe, 2/24). The rate of health care spending growth is expected to decline over the next five years in part because people will lose their jobs and health coverage as the recession continues, and they will forgo medical treatment; however, the economy will be shrinking and growing at a slower rate, which will increase health care spending's share of GDP (Young, The Hill, 2/24).

The study found that in 2009, government health care spending is expected to increase by 7.4% to $1.19 trillion, while private health spending is expected to increase by 3.9% to $1.32 trillion (Wall Street Journal, 2/24). CMS projects that in 2018 overall U.S. health care spending will reach $4.35 trillion, accounting for 20.3% of the GDP (The Hill, 2/24). The study estimates that health care costs will average $8,160 per U.S. resident in 2009, up $356 from 2008, and will reach $13,100 per U.S. resident by 2018 (Alonso-Zaldivar, AP/Boston Globe, 2/24).

The report forecasts that the government will pay for more than 50% of total health care spending by 2016 and 51.3% by 2018, as Medicaid enrollment increases and baby boomers start enrolling in Medicare (Pugh, McClatchy/St. Paul Pioneer Press, 2/24). According to the study, Medicaid spending will increase from $352 billion in 2008 to $801 billion by 2018. The report estimates that Medicare enrollment increases will drive up the spending growth rate in the program from 6.2% in 2011 to 8.6% in 2018.

CMS predicts that final Medicare figures will show spending of $466 billion for 2008, 8.1% higher than in 2007 (Reichard, CQ HealthBeat, 2/24). According to the report, Medicare's hospital trust fund could become insolvent by 2016 -- three years earlier than previous estimates -- because of lower tax revenue caused by the recession (AP/Boston Globe, 2/24).

Additional Findings The study predicts that private health insurance enrollment will drop from 195.5 million in 2008 to 189.5 million in 2010 (CQ HealthBeat, 2/24). Private health spending is expected to increase as the economy improves, growing to 4.2% in 2010 and reaching 6.1% by 2018 (Reuters/Boston Globe, 2/24). The report also estimates spending growth rates for overall health spending in 2008 of 7.2% for hospitals, 6.2% for physician and clinical services, 9.1% for home health care, and 4.6% for nursing homes (CQ HealthBeat, 2/24). The rate of prescription drug spending increased by 3.5% in 2008, down from 4.9% in 2007, which study co-author Andrea Sisko attributes to U.S. residents' being more willing to use generics and less inclined to fill prescriptions as the economy declines.

The report projects that the recession would begin to improve in 2010 and health spending growth would surge again in 2011 (Reuters/Boston Globe, 2/24). The study did not examine the impact of the recently enacted stimulus package, which includes $87 billion in increased Medicaid aid, nor did the report take into account the expansion of CHIP (Wall Street Journal, 2/24). The estimate includes a scheduled 21% cut to Medicare physician payment rates, but Congress and President Obama are expected to block the cuts. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that blocking the cut will cost at least $100 billion over 10 years (The Hill, 2/24).

The study is available online.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Obama releases $15 billion in Medicaid funding to states

2009-02-23T14:43:00.000-08:00

President Obama, meeting with the nation's governors in Washington, D.C., this morning, announced a quick release to the states of $15 billion of federal Medicaid relief funding to help them cope with the rising health care costs brought on by the economic crisis. According to a White House press release, the money will be available in 48 hours--on Wednesday--in special Treasury accounts set up for the states to access.

"That means that by the time most of you get home," said President Obama, "money will be waiting to help 20 million vulnerable Americans in your states keep their health coverage. Children with asthma will be able to breathe easier, seniors won’t need to fear losing their doctors, and pregnant women with limited means won’t need to worry about the health of their babies.”

The funding is part of the designated moneys from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, and the temporary increase will be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The federal agency will coordinate with states to ensure they are properly meeting regulations and requirements about Medicaid.

The announcement of the funding release was made as President Obama and Vice President Biden hosted members of the National Governors Association at the White House.

A state-by-state grant award summary for the program can be found here.

SusanG@dailykos.com

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Care Givers on Bikes!

2009-02-20T17:11:00.000-08:00

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Gentiva to divest six home healthcare branches to Loving Care Agency

2009-02-20T17:01:00.000-08:00

By Datamonitor staff writer

Gentiva Health Services, a provider of comprehensive home health services, has entered into an asset purchase agreement with Andventure, doing business as Loving Care Agency and Links2Care, for the sale of six Gentiva branch offices in four cities that specialize in pediatric home healthcare and also provide adult home health aide services.

These offices comprise more than 80% of Gentiva's current pediatric care operations. Terms have not been disclosed. According to Gentiva, the transaction fits with its stated objective of increasing its focus on skilled home health services for geriatric patients.
Under the terms of the transaction that Gentiva has announced, Loving Care Agency will acquire existing Gentiva branches in Phoenix, Arizona; Springfield, Massachusetts; Pittsburgh and State College, Pennsylvania. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter, subject to all customary approvals.

Tony Strange, CEO of Gentiva, said: "This agreement with Loving Care, a leader in pediatric homecare services, will build on the high quality of care that these branches have provided. Our decision to migrate away from pediatric home healthcare is in keeping with the company's strategy of focusing on geriatric specialties.

"We believe our emphasis on providing value-added services to this population will translate into higher margins and returns that we can leverage to continue to grow our core home health business."

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Bailout Plan for Medicaid

2009-02-16T16:59:00.000-08:00

The plan offers $87 billion to help states administer Medicaid. That could slow or reverse some of the steps states have taken to cut the program.

Now is the time to ensure that your home health care agency is fully compliant and able to handle the volume of work required for timely reimbursements...

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Home health care benefits both taxpayers and patients

2009-02-12T17:14:00.000-08:00

As Gov. David Paterson tries to make New York State's budget ends meet, he is met with cry after cry -- ''You can't cut my program!''

We've all seen the heart-rending ads on TV. There's one proposed cut, however, that doesn't make sense even for the people it least affects directly: home health care.

The governor wants to cut Medicaid reimbursement rates between 1.5 percent and 3.5 percent for certified home health agencies and long term home health care programs; he's also proposing an additional, across-the-board cut of 1 percent in all Medicaid rates, the elimination of an inflation-based increase in payments to home health providers for 2008 and 2009, and a 0.7 percent tax on revenues.

The Home Care Association of New York State says these actions likely will force many home care providers to drastically reduce services or go out of business. And without the option of home care, people who have depended on it are likely to end up back in hospitals and nursing homes, where taxpayers will pick up a much larger Medicaid bill.

The governor figures his proposal will save the state $184 million in Medicaid costs in 2009-10; since the federal government contributes toward Medicaid, it means a cut of about $347 million in federal home health funding. Does Gov. Paterson think the people who no longer can get home health care are just going to disappear? Too many will need to be moved into more expensive hospitals and nursing homes. Home health care is less expensive, and provides better care, most experts agree. Why would we want to end a program that does that?

New York State's Medicaid program has been described as the ''Cadillac'' of programs, offering more coverage than most other states do. It is better coverage than many people can afford from private insurers, and better than the coverage offered by many employers. Shouldn't this be an area that could be looked at for cuts before threatening programs that actually save taxpayers money while providing better care for patients?

Neither the taxpayers nor the patients will be better off under these proposed budget cuts. We urge Gov. Patterson to reconsider.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

California is Ready for Obama HIE Stimulus

2009-02-11T15:03:00.000-08:00

White Paper Describes “Shovel-Ready” Project

President Obama's economic stimulus package is an opportunity to accelerate health information exchange in California through a “shovel-ready” statewide HIE. As a result of the planning and activities accomplished by CalRHIO and its stakeholders, California has completed key requirements called for in the legislation and is ready to deploy and implement HIE across the state.

A new White Paper discusses achievements that demonstrate California's readiness:

1. A proven statewide HIE solution, selected through a rigorous competitive process, is ready to deploy; implementation plans are fully developed.

2. A statewide public-private HIE organization is already established, with fully operational governance and management, and support from a broad range of stakeholders.

3. The statewide HIE solution, embraced by many local RHIOs, offers an efficient, affordable way for providers and communities all over California to collaborate and participate in an interoperable HIE.

4. Privacy and security standards and policies, which either meet or exceed national recommendations, are tested and in place.

5. Clinical use cases have been defined and support the strategy for launching the statewide HIE in hospital emergency departments and then expanding into physician offices.

6. A sustainable business model has been created that ensures a statewide HIE network can be deployed, maintained, and continually improved over the long-term.

To view the full White Paper, click here.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Sobering results for cost-cutting Medicare project

2009-02-11T14:38:00.001-08:00

By LINDSEY TANNER AP Medical Writer © 2009 The Associated Press
Feb. 10, 2009, 5:24PM

CHICAGO — An ambitious effort to cut costs and keep aging, sick Medicare patients out of the hospital mostly didn't work, a government-contracted study found. The disappointing results show how tough it is to manage older patients with chronic diseases, who often take multiple prescriptions, see many different doctors and sometimes get conflicting medical advice.
The study showed just how hard it is to change the habits of older patients and their sometimes inflexible doctors. And it points up the challenges the Obama administration will face in trying to reform health care for an aging nation.

Most of the patients had serious, but common, age-related illnesses including diabetes, heart disease and lung disease. Programs were set up at 15 centers around the country. Only two cut the number of times these patients were hospitalized, and those are still in operation. None saved Medicare any money.

The authors of the study called the results "underwhelming." An editorial in the Journal of the American Medical Association, where the study appears Wednesday, used the term "sobering."
"The only way you can really do it is by changing patients' behavior and by changing physicians' behavior, and both things are really hard to do," said study author Randall Brown, a researcher at Mathematica Policy Research Inc., in Princeton, N.J., which was hired to evaluate the programs.

Often, these patients need to stop smoking, or lose weight, exercise more, eat healthier foods — a challenge even for generally healthy people. Those changes are especially tough for sick, older patients who often are set in their ways.

"The same thing with physicians," Brown said. "A lot of them feel like they know how to take care of patients, so why do they need a nurse calling up and asking them why the patient isn't on some certain medication?"

Many patients in the study had more than one chronic disease, a common Medicare scenario. In 2002 alone, half of Medicare patients had been treated for five or more ailments, and they accounted for 75 percent of Medicare spending, the study authors noted.

Seeking ways to reduce those costs and improve care, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services selected 15 proposals for test-site programs in 2002. The sites developed their own programs, enrolling a total of 18,309 fee-for-service Medicare patients through 2006.

About half got the patients got the usual care. The others got more intensive, coordinated care. That often involved nurses who acted as go-betweens, helping doctors give patients clear, appropriate advice; counseling patients on changing bad habits and recognizing worrisome symptoms. The nurses were available on a regular basis by phone or in person to answer patients' questions.

Jim Reid, a 74-year-old retired Pennsylvania welder, was among study patients who got coordinated care.

When he enrolled in 2002 in a test program run by Health Quality Partners, a nonprofit group in Doylestown, Pa., he was obese, had high blood pressure, high cholesterol and pre-diabetes.
But Reid was a rare success story.

He actually took the advice offered in group sessions run by nurses. He learned how to read food labels and avoid salty, calorie-laden foods. He also started exercising, walking with a pedometer and building up to a few miles daily.

Now, he breakfasts on oatmeal or vegetable omelets instead of coffee and doughnuts He's lost almost 60 pounds. His blood pressure and cholesterol have greatly improved and his pre-diabetes is gone.

Sticking with the program "is hard," he acknowledged. "As you get older, you don't want to do it." But he said it has "put an extra 10 years in my life."

Reid credits his success to the personal attention of a nurse coordinator.
"I have to have somebody to own up to," he said.

That close, in-person contact with nurses was also a feature of the project's other more successful, still-operating program, at Mercy Medical Center-North Iowa in Mason City, Iowa.
In both programs, each patient had face-to-face contact an average of about once a month with a nurse. That was far more frequent personal contact than in other programs. Both reduced hospitalizations — 17 percent yearly compared with usual-care patients at Mercy, and by about 20 percent in the Pennsylvania program, but only among its sicker patients. That program worked with Doylestown Hospital and recruited patients from area physicians' offices.

Targeting sicker patients and providing frequent in-person contact show the approach has some benefits and that success with future reform efforts "is possible, but it's not easy," Brown said.

Peter Ashkenaz, a spokesman for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the agency is evaluating the Iowa and Pennsylvania programs to see if their positive results persist.

He said there are other approaches being tested, some that offer incentives to doctors who meet quality benchmarks, or who use electronic health records to improve quality.

But so far, Ashkenaz said, "as the study shows, we have not yet found broad success."

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

What The Stimulus Plan Means to Healthcare

2009-02-11T14:37:00.000-08:00

A comparison of the $838 billion economic recovery plan passed by the Senate with an $820 billion version passed by the House. Additional debt costs would add almost $350 billion over 10 years. Many provisions expire in two years.

From the Associated Press:

HEALTH CARE:

Senate — $20 billion to subsidize health care insurance for the unemployed under the COBRA program; $87 billion to help states with Medicaid; $22 billion to modernize health information technology systems; $10 billion for health research and construction of National Institutes of Health facilities.

House — $40 billion for more generous COBRA subsidies and to provide health care through Medicaid; $87 billion to help states with Medicaid; $20 billion to modernize health information technology systems; $4 billion for preventative care; $1.5 billion for community health centers; $420 million to combat avian flu; $335 million for programs that combat AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases and tuberculosis.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Good News from Palmetto - GBA RESOLUTION ACHIEVED

2009-02-11T14:36:00.000-08:00

Claims Submitted through Direct Data Entry in Status/Location SM95HG

Palmetto GBA just announced that claims that were submitted through direct data entry (DDE) and are pending in FISS Status/Location SM95HG have been corrected and are being released for processing. These claims were submitted via DDE between November 3, 2008, and December 2, 2008 and received a duplicate document control number (DCN). PalmettoGBA is keenly aware this issue has affected sequential billing for some Home Health and Hospice providers. Once the affected claims begin to process to completion sequential billing can resume.

Previously issued accelerated payments are scheduled for recoupment beginning March 2, 2009.

To learn more about the resolution to this matter and others, we encourage you to visit the Palmetto GBA RHHI Claims Processing Issues Log located at this link.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

NGS Notification regarding debit/credit issue

2009-02-11T14:28:00.000-08:00

National Government Services is experiencing an issue whereby some Part A debit/credit adjustments were assigned duplicate DCNs and are therefore being rejected by HIGLAS. This is primarily impacting home health and hospice providers, since home health final claims process as debit/credit adjustments if they are tied to a RAP. National Government Services is working with CMS, IBM, and FISS to resolve this issue and expects a resolution on April 6. No action is required by providers at this time.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Revised Home Health Prospective Payment System Fact Sheet

2009-02-11T14:24:00.002-08:00

See the latest information at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNProducts/downloads/HomeHlthProspPymtfctsht09-508.pdf.
Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Home Health Care - the business to start!

2009-02-11T14:23:00.001-08:00

It's official - Home Health Care is one of few businesses that can survive the current economic crisis. Here is what the blog biziki.com has to say about Home Health Care:

While employment in the health service industry is projected to grow 28% by 2012, employment in the specialized home health care industry is expected to be
nearly twice that, or 54.5%. Each year, over 7.6 million people are provided with home health care services.

Thanks to science and medicine, people are living to a ripe old age more and more. This means, however, that more people are needed assistance at home. And that is where home health care comes into the picture.

Just think, 7.6 million people, 6 episodes per year, $3000 per episode - that is potentially a $136,800,000,000/year industry.
Want a bigger slice of that pie?
Find out why Igea HHC from Indura Systems is THE PREFERRED home health care agency management system for more customers throughout the United States.
Read the whole blog at http://www.biziki.com/biz/top-industries-to-start-a-business/.
Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Benefits for Veterans in New Jersey

2009-02-11T14:22:00.002-08:00

A very useful and detailed blog posting that covers information about benefits for Veterans in New Jersey:

http://www.dvanarelli.com/blog/2009/01/27/the-basics-of-va-pension-benefits/
Brought to you by Indura Systems.

NAHC Regulatory Affairs Update

2009-02-11T14:22:00.001-08:00

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) developed a brief emergency preparedness guide for home health providers and patients. They have asked NAHC to help disseminate the guide and seek feedback on its utility.

The developers are also interested in any general comments providers have. http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/oha-home-health-care-preparedness.pdf

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Change for the Country = Change for the Bidens

2009-02-11T14:21:00.000-08:00

Vice President's Family Faces Same Decision as Millions: How to Care for Mom?

SUNRISE, Fla., Jan. 23 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- While Michelle Obama's mother, Marian Robinson, moves into the White House to help with childcare, Joe Biden's sprightly mother, Jean, is in for some life changes of her own. Ms. Biden, who is in her early nineties, has lived with her son and his family at their Delaware home for years. With Joe Biden moving to Washington, D.C. to take on the demanding job of Vice President, the family has decided that Ms. Biden will remain in Delaware. They will face additional transition as they determine how to continue providing her with care that meets her needs.

The Bidens are the most visible example of a life-changing decision that millions of families must make each year. For many, the sensitive topic of how to care for an aging parent can be daunting, with no clear roadmap on how to make the best decision.

One thing is clear: the worst thing to do is to deny the need or avoid the discussion. "If you wait until your parent is having a health crisis, you are forced to make crucial decisions without the benefit of research or interviews with prospective caregivers - maybe not even reliable information about your parent's health conditions or medications," says Kathleen Gilmartin, RN, President and CEO of Interim HealthCare (http://www.interimhealthcare.com/), a leading provider of health care personnel at all skill levels in all settings. "The sooner you open dialogue with your parent, the easier the transition will be for them and for you."

Read the full article.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Governor's plan would "dismantle" home health care system

2009-02-11T14:20:00.000-08:00

North County Public Radio: Friday January 23, 2009

Advocates for home health care are fanning out across the state to head off a proposal from Gov. Paterson to re-structure the way home health aides are paid. Rebecca Leahy, ex. dir. of a private not-for-profit that serves clients from northern Warren County to the Canadian border, in Franklin County, says the governor's plans would dismantle a system that's provided care to thousands of elderly and disabled people across the North Country for 25 years.

Licensed, private not-for-profits provide in-home care under contract to counties. Leahy’s organization, North Country Home Services, serves over 900 clients a day. County public health nurses evaluate clients to determine what care each needs. The private agencies provide the aides that do the day-to-day in-home work. They’re paid by Medicare money, passed through the counties.

The governor wants to eliminate the private contracts. In order for Medicare to pay, his budget would require home health aides to be county employees. Leahy has talked with all the counties she has contracts with. She told Martha Foley it won’t work.

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

Look Back - Obama Experiences Home Health Care

2009-02-11T14:19:00.001-08:00

After mopping kitchen and bathroom floors in the home of 86-year-old John Thornton in East Oakland, Calif., with health care worker Pauline Beck, Obama told reporters, "I'm not going to lie to you. It's been awhile" (Chicago Tribune, 8/9/2008).

Obama used the experience, which was attended by a television crew and photographers, to highlight the importance of home health care workers and promote benefits including paid sick leave and vacation for service workers -- neither of which Beck receives, according to the AP/Houston Chronicle (AP/Houston Chronicle, 8/9/2008).

Brought to you by Indura Systems.

NEWS RELEASE: Joint Commission - Jan 20, 2009

2009-02-11T14:16:00.001-08:00

The Joint Commission to Include Patient Satisfaction Data on Quality Check™
Web site provides new information to help patients make decisions

(OAKBROOK TERRACE, Ill. – January 20, 2009) People seeking information about how patients perceive the care they received at a particular hospital can now find this information on The Joint Commission’s Quality Check™ Web site, http://www.qualitycheck.org/.

The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Hospital Compare Web site is posted on Quality Check™ beginning this month. This information will be updated quarterly.

HCAHPS information comes from patient ratings of communication with doctors, communication with nurses, responsiveness of hospital staff, cleanliness and quietness of the hospital, pain management, communication about medications, and discharge information. In addition to information about patient satisfaction, Quality Check also includes data from CMS on 30-day mortality rates for heart attack, heart failure and pneumonia.

Thousands of people use Quality Check each month to find information about the more than 15,000 accredited health care organizations that have earned The Joint Commission “Gold Seal of Approval.” Quality Check provides details about an organization’s accreditation status, efforts to prevent medical mistakes by complying with National Patient Safety Goals, and comparison information about how hospitals comply with National Quality Improvement Goals such as giving heart attack patients aspirin within a specified timeframe.
Brought to you by Indura Systems

Introduction to Indura Systems

2009-02-11T14:12:00.000-08:00

Home health care is one of the most regulated industries in the United States. Any organization that is associated with the health care industry is also open to aggressive litigation.

Any health care organization could spend considerable time understanding, and keeping track of, all the rules and regulations that apply, and are regularly being amended. With a fluctuating economy and shifts in age demographics, agencies are increasingly being expected to perform better with fewer resources.

Indura Systems understands the home health care industry from the agency perspective. Igea HHC, from Indura Systems, gives our customers the essential tools to achieve three things:

1. To focus on running their business effectively, and with lower overheads
2. To adhere to constantly changing regulatory controls including data security measures
3. To minimize time to reimbursement of payments from Medicare, Medicaid and/or Private Duty.

Igea HHC can deliver these benefits because the system has been built on a rugged, tested, and proven workflow model. The system is not only simple to use and easy to tailor to individual agency needs, but also helps maximize profit and shield agency staff from much of the complexity of home health care administrative tasks.

Contact us at Indura Systems to learn more about how we partner with home health care agencies to support and optimize their business success.